Page 1 Created with Sketch.
  • United States (US)
  • Canada (CA)
  • China (CN)
  • Russia (RU)
  • Afghanistan (AF)
  • Aland Islands (AX)
  • Albania (AL)
  • Algeria (DZ)
  • American Samoa (AS)
  • Andorra (AD)
  • Angola (AO)
  • Anguilla (AI)
  • Antigua & Barbuda (AG)
  • Argentina (AR)
  • Armenia (AM)
  • Aruba (AW)
  • Australia (AU)
  • Austria (AT)
  • Azerbaijan (AZ)
  • Bahamas (BS)
  • Bahrain (BH)
  • Bangladesh (BD)
  • Barbados (BB)
  • Belarus (BY)
  • Belgium (BE)
  • Belize (BZ)
  • Benin (BJ)
  • Bermuda (BM)
  • Bhutan (BT)
  • Bolivia (BO)
  • Bosnia & Herzegovina (BA)
  • Botswana (BW)
  • Brazil (BR)
  • British Virgin Islands (VG)
  • Brunei (BN)
  • Bulgaria (BG)
  • Burkina Faso (BF)
  • Burundi (BI)
  • Cambodia (KH)
  • Cameroon (CM)
  • Canada (CA)
  • Cape Verde (CV)
  • Cayman Islands (KY)
  • Central African Republic (CF)
  • Chad (TD)
  • Chile (CL)
  • China (CN)
  • Colombia (CO)
  • Congo - Democratic Republic of (CD)
  • Congo - Republic of (CG)
  • Cook Islands (CK)
  • Costa Rica (CR)
  • Cote D'Ivoire (CI)
  • Croatia (HR)
  • Cyprus (CY)
  • Czech Republic (CZ)
  • Denmark (DK)
  • Djibouti (DJ)
  • Dominica (DM)
  • Dominican Republic (DO)
  • Ecuador (EC)
  • Egypt (EG)
  • El Salvador (SV)
  • Equatorial Guinea (GQ)
  • Eritrea (ER)
  • Estonia (EE)
  • Ethiopia (ET)
  • Faroe Islands (FO)
  • Fiji (FJ)
  • Finland (FI)
  • France (FR)
  • French Guiana (GF)
  • French Polynesia (PF)
  • Gabon (GA)
  • Gambia (GM)
  • Georgia (GE)
  • Germany (DE)
  • Ghana (GH)
  • Gibraltar (GI)
  • Greece (GR)
  • Greenland (GL)
  • Grenada (GD)
  • Guadeloupe (GP)
  • Guam (GU)
  • Guatemala (GT)
  • Guernsey (GG)
  • Guinea (GN)
  • Guinea-Bissau (GW)
  • Guyana (GY)
  • Haiti (HT)
  • Honduras (HN)
  • Hong Kong SAR (HK)
  • Hungary (HU)
  • Iceland (IS)
  • India (IN)
  • Indonesia (ID)
  • Iraq (IQ)
  • Ireland (IE)
  • Israel (IL)
  • Italy (IT)
  • Jamaica (JM)
  • Japan (JP)
  • Jersey (JE)
  • Jordan (JO)
  • Kazakhstan (KZ)
  • Kenya (KE)
  • Kiribati (KI)
  • Kosovo (CS)
  • Kuwait (KW)
  • Kyrgyzstan (KG)
  • Laos (LA)
  • Latvia (LV)
  • Lebanon (LB)
  • Lesotho (LS)
  • Liberia (LR)
  • Libya (LY)
  • Liechtenstein (LI)
  • Lithuania (LT)
  • Luxembourg (LU)
  • Macau SAR (MO)
  • Macedonia (MK)
  • Madagascar (MG)
  • Malawi (MW)
  • Malaysia (MY)
  • Maldives (MV)
  • Mali (ML)
  • Malta (MT)
  • Marshall Islands (MH)
  • Martinique (MQ)
  • Mauritania (MR)
  • Mauritius (MU)
  • Mexico (MX)
  • Micronesia (FM)
  • Moldova (MD)
  • Monaco (MC)
  • Mongolia (MN)
  • Montenegro (ME)
  • Montserrat (MS)
  • Morocco (MA)
  • Mozambique (MZ)
  • Namibia (NA)
  • Nepal (NP)
  • Netherlands (NL)
  • Netherlands Antilles (AN)
  • New Caledonia (NC)
  • New Zealand (NZ)
  • Nicaragua (NI)
  • Niger (NE)
  • Nigeria (NG)
  • Norfolk Island (NF)
  • Northern Mariana Islands (MP)
  • Norway (NO)
  • Oman (OM)
  • Pakistan (PK)
  • Palau (PW)
  • Panama (PA)
  • Papua New Guinea (PG)
  • Paraguay (PY)
  • Peru (PE)
  • Philippines (PH)
  • Poland (PL)
  • Portugal (PT)
  • Puerto Rico (PR)
  • Qatar (QA)
  • Reunion (RE)
  • Romania (RO)
  • Russia (RU)
  • Rwanda (RW)
  • Samoa (WS)
  • San Marino (SM)
  • Saudi Arabia (SA)
  • Senegal (SN)
  • Serbia (RS)
  • Seychelles (SC)
  • Sierra Leone (SL)
  • Singapore (SG)
  • Slovakia (SK)
  • Slovenia (SI)
  • Solomon Islands (SB)
  • South Africa (ZA)
  • South Korea (KR)
  • Spain (ES)
  • Sri Lanka (LK)
  • St. Kitts & Nevis (KN)
  • St. Lucia (LC)
  • St. Martin (MF)
  • St. Vincent & the Grenadines (VC)
  • Suriname (SR)
  • Swaziland (SZ)
  • Sweden (SE)
  • Switzerland (CH)
  • Taiwan Region (TW)
  • Tajikistan (TJ)
  • Tanzania (TZ)
  • Thailand (TH)
  • Timor-Leste (TL)
  • Togo (TG)
  • Tonga (TO)
  • Trinidad & Tobago (TT)
  • Tunisia (TN)
  • Turkey (TR)
  • Turkmenistan (TM)
  • Turks & Caicos (TC)
  • Tuvalu (TV)
  • US Virgin Island (VI)
  • Uganda (UG)
  • Ukraine (UA)
  • United Arab Emirates (AE)
  • United Kingdom (GB)
  • United States (US)
  • Uruguay (UY)
  • Uzbekistan (UZ)
  • Vanuatu (VU)
  • Vatican City (VA)
  • Venezuela (VE)
  • Vietnam (VN)
  • Wallis & Futuna Islands (WF)
  • Yemen (YE)
  • Zambia (ZM)
  • Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Full Translations
  • English
  • Chinese (中文)
  • Russian (русский)
  • Partial Translations
  • French (Français)
  • German (Deutsch)
  • Japanese (日本語)
  • Korean (한국어)
  • Spanish (Español)
  • Popular Currencies
  • US Dollar ($USD)
  • Chinese Yuan Renminbi (¥CNY)
  • Euro (€EUR)
  • Canadian Dollar ($CAD)
  • Pound Sterling (£GBP)
  • Japanese Yen (¥JPY)
  • South Korean Won (₩KRW)
  • Russian Ruble (RUB)
  • Emirati Dirham (AED)
  • More Options
  • Australian Dollar ($AUD)
  • Brazilian Real ($BRL)
  • Danish Krone (DKK)
  • Hong Kong Dollar ($HKD)
  • Indian Rupee (₹INR)
  • Israeli Shekel (₪ILS)
  • Kuwaiti Dinar (KWD)
  • Mexican Peso ($MXN)
  • New Zealand Dollar ($NZD)
  • Norwegian Krone (NOK)
  • Polish Zloty (PLN)
  • Saudi Arabian Riyal (SAR)
  • Singapore Dollar (SGD)
  • South African Rand (ZAR)
  • Swedish Krona (SEK)
  • Swiss Franc (CHF)
  • Taiwanese New Dollar ($TWD)
  • Turkish Lira (TRY)
My Style: Classic, Casual Chic
Reviews: 41
Average Rating: 2.5
41 reviews 1 2 3 4 5
Feels Cheap
I am surprised at the low quality of this item given the price. The material is very flimsy, which is not exactly what you want when you are 7 months pregnant. Only the bust is lined, leaving some of the garment potentially sheer and creating a weird, quasi-shelf bra. I have purchased maternity dresses at Old Navy for like $16 that are far better quality than this. I was hoping to wear this to a business attire charity event, but it looked far too cheap. I will be sending it back.
report inappropriate content
Pretty, but overpriced
I think this item is very pretty in person. The druzy and moonstone are lovely. It is exactly the necklace I was looking for. However, the quality does not justify the price. It feels flimsy in hand and is not even solid gold, only gold vermeil. I would keep it if it was about $250 less.
report inappropriate content
Love the cheeky-ness
I know the previous reviewer thought these were too small, but I love them. Right now my theme for bottoms is "the cheekier the better." I usually wear a size 26 or 27 jeans, and have an athletic build and ordered these in a medium. I definitely have some (toned but juicy) junk in my trunk, but I was looking for a cheekier fit. and did not expect the bottoms to have much coverage at all. If you want bottoms that really embrace the cheeky trend, these are them. They are similar to the coverage of the L Space Itsy Bottom. If you want more of what I would call "full coverage brazilian" do not order these. Plenty of other brands/styles show a hint of cheek. I wish there were more bottoms like these!
Sizing: True to Size / As Expected
report inappropriate content
Posted August 11, 2015
Not as pictured
I ordered this item in 2 sizes (small and medium). Both rompers I received had an extra strip of elastic under the bust (not shown in the picture), creating a visible shelf bra. The fabric under the "bra" poofs out along the stomach/waist, until it is brought back in by the waist elastic. It is the weirdest design element I have ever seen. I was so disappointed by this, as it is not shown in the photo. (The photo only shows the top elastic banding and the waist elastic, not the weird underboob elastic). I also agree with the previous reviewer that this item is overpriced for what it is. It's not poor quality (other than the false advertising), but it is not worth $200.
report inappropriate content
awful fit
I want to love these leggings so much. The prints are amazing. The fit, however, is terrible. For perspective, I wear a size 27 in most brands of jeans (7s, Citizens, Current/Elliot, J Brand). I ordered these in both a medium and a large. The waistband on the medium gave me an awful muffin top. (I do not have a large waist. It is about 26.5 - 27.5" depending on what I ate for lunch that day). The elastic is so narrow that unless you have no fat on your waist or back, it is going to pinch. The large waistband was slightly better (though not 100% better), but the fabric in the legs (especially at the knees) was too large. I wish these were cut better because the fabric is great. So sad that these did not work.
report inappropriate content
Posted September 11, 2014
I thought this dress was just "meh." The cut was very unexciting. I have an athletic hourglass-ish shape (basically 35.5-26.5-37.5) and dress just sort of swallowed me up. It wasn't "big" necessarily, but it just sort of hung. I ordered both a medium and small, and sizing down didn't help. I think it might be cuter on someone with more pronounced curves and/or a bigger-than-B-cup bust. I did like that it wasn't see-through and I would not have had to hem to wear with flats if I kept it. (I am just shy of 5'5".) .
Sizing: True to Size / As Expected
report inappropriate content
weird cut
I liked the fabric on this top. I did not like that the cut in the back is higher than in the front, like a reverse high/low top. I would have preferred if it was long enough to provide some coverage coming and going.
report inappropriate content
Posted September 11, 2014
So soft
I bought this to wear on long plane rides. I figured wearing a maxi dress jean jacket, then swapping out the jean jacket for this funnel jacket one I boarded, would be as comfortable as lululemon wunder under legging and a define jacket but would look much cuter. This jacket is insanely soft. It is so cozy it is like wearing a blanket. My only gripe is that the pockets lay somewhat awkwardly and, due to their cut/angle, are not very useful because things fall out. I think I am going to cut the pockets out and sew them closed. Other than that this jacket is perfect for stealth comfort.
Sizing: True to Size / As Expected
report inappropriate content
Terrible Quality Fabric
This dress is completely see-through. Not just sheer. See- through. I have never put a garment on my body that unintentionally left so little to the imagination. I could see every single inch of my legs, thighs, abs, and other bits as clear as day. This dress might be acceptable if I wore two of them layered on on top of the other. I do not know how the designer or shopbop can even sell this with a straight face. It's such a shame because the cut is gorgeous and fits amazingly. The fabric is just so bad though. I almost want it to be a manufacturing error because the fit is so gorgeous, but I ordered this dress in two sizes and they were equally ridiculously see-through.
Sizing: True to Size / As Expected
report inappropriate content
Posted April 15, 2014
Highly variable
I ordered this jacket in both a small and a medium. There was a very large discrepancy between the two sizes. I have an athletic/muscular upper body and small waist. The small was way too tight in my arms/chest/back, but fit my waist nicely. The medium fit my upper body well, but looked too boxy. The jackets were also two totally different colors. The small was much lighter (which I preferred), while the medium was more cornflower blue. It was very strange to see such a difference between the two pieces. I did not keep either jacket. On the plus side the material was very soft but felt sturdy. I wish I had found a better fit in with one of them.
Sizing: Smaller than Expected
report inappropriate content